Only a few years ago, searching for case precedent was a tough and time consuming job, requiring people today to search through print copies of case regulation, or to pay for access to commercial online databases. Today, the internet has opened up a number of case regulation search options, and plenty of sources offer free access to case regulation.
However, Should the same person were charged with section three hundred and 302, their defence that they never meant to kill the person – and that they just planned to injure them or incapacitate them –, will are unsuccessful, as the elements in the offence only demand the intent to cause injury being proven, not the intention to cause death.
V) During investigation, the Investigating Officer concluded that hearth-arm injury which was fatal for the deceased was caused by the petitioner but in support of opinion with the Investigating Officer no iota of evidence is obtainable about the file and mere ipsi dixit of police just isn't binding about the Court.
To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not reply to inquiries seeking legal guidance or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed towards the court in which the case has been or will be filed.
139 . Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Given the legal analysis on the subject issue, we've been in the view that the claim on the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Original contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is not really legally sound, Other than promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They can be issue to rules and regulations In the event the recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case with the petitioners for promotion could possibly be deemed, however, we are obvious inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded for seniority and promotion since the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Exercise, subject matter to availability of vacancy subject to your approval with the competent authority.
This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding arrived at by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In the event the conclusion or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court could interfere with the conclusion or perhaps the finding and mildew the relief to make it acceptable to your facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-value the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified via the decision with the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
(Interview by email, with Ahmad Rafay Alam, a leading environmental lawyer and activist in Pakistan, August 28th, 2015). Furthermore, the ruling placed a notice and comment restriction on government agencies in regards to projects that could probably pose a public risk. This case can be noteworthy, “because it laid down the foundations of all future public interest litigation brought before courts for environmental protection.” To cite only one example, following this case, the Supreme Court, citing the Zia decision, found in the Salt Miners Case (decided on 12th July, 1994) that the right to have water free from pollution and contamination can be a right to life itself.
The Court considered the case for being maintainable under Article 184 (3) Considering that the Risk and encroachment alleged were such as to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.
The legislation as recognized in previous court rulings; like common law, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
Therefore, this petition is found being not maintainable which is dismissed along with the pending application(s), plus the petitioners may perhaps search for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
This article delves into the intricacies from the recent amendment, accompanied here by relevant case regulation, to deliver an extensive understanding of its implications and realistic applications.
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that could possibly be consulted in deciding a current case. It may be used to guide the court, but will not be binding precedent.
Stacy, a tenant inside of a duplex owned by Martin, filed a civil lawsuit against her landlord, claiming he experienced not supplied her adequate notice before raising her rent, citing a fresh state law that demands a minimum of ninety days’ notice. Martin argues that The brand new legislation applies only to landlords of large multi-tenant properties.